Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.
Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell (2013)
One-Sentence Thesis
The authors argue that speakers can genuinely disagree with each other even while not meaning the same thing by their words, and that metalinguistic negotiations are a common mechanism for reflecting such disagreements.
Argument Outline
- 1Introduction to Hare's case of the missionary and the cannibals
- 2Discussion of the intuition that the missionary and the cannibals are genuinely disagreeing
- 3Critique of Hare's argument that the missionary and the cannibals must mean the same thing by the word 'good'
- 4Introduction to the concept of metalinguistic usage and metalinguistic negotiations
- 5Discussion of the role of metalinguistic negotiations in reflecting disagreements about conceptual ethics
Key Distinctions
Between descriptive and prescriptive matters of word usage
Between metalinguistic usage and literal usage of linguistic expressions
Key Terms
Metalinguistic usage
Metalinguistic negotiation
Conceptual ethics
Flashcards
30 cardsRelated Questions
In Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell's "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.", the authors responds to which of the following?
In Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell's "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.", Plunkett and Sundell explains which of the following?
Which concept is a central focus of Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell's "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms."?
Which of the following does Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell responds to in "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms."?
In Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell's "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.", Pekka Väyrynen writes which of the following?
In Plunkett, David, and Timothy Sundell's "Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms.", Egan supports which of the following?