Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect
Quinn (1989)
One-Sentence Thesis
The Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) is an anticonsequentialist principle that discriminates between morally problematic agency based on the intention behind an action, favoring actions where harm is merely foreseen over those where harm is intended as a means.
Argument Outline
- 1Introduction to the DDE and its significance in moral theory
- 2Presentation of the DDE's conditions for morally permissible agency
- 3Discussion of the principle's controversial idea that the pursuit of a good is less acceptable when harm is intended as a means
- 4Examination of two major problems with the DDE: formulation and rationale
- 5Analysis of pairs of cases that illustrate the DDE's distinction, including the Strategic Bomber, Terror Bomber, Direction of Resources, Guinea Pig, Craniotomy, and Hysterectomy cases
Key Distinctions
Intended vs. merely foreseen harm
Directly vs. indirectly intended harm
Consequentialist vs. nonconsequentialist moral theories
Key Terms
Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE)
Consequentialism
Nonconsequentialism
Flashcards
18 cardsRelated Questions
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", Warren S. Quinn defends which of the following?
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", Bennett mentions which of the following?
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", Jonathan Bennett criticizes which of the following?
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", DDE strengthens which of the following?
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", Bennett supports which of the following?
In Quinn's "Actions, Intentions and Consequences: the Doctrine of Double Effect", Elizabeth Anscombe defines which of the following?