When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley
Woodcock (2017)
One-Sentence Thesis
Consequentialists should reject silent schadenfreude and debunking attack strategies and instead opt for robust advantage, emphasizing intricate calculations to defend against objections based on friendship and integrity.
Argument Outline
- 1Introduction to the trolley problem and consequentialist strategies
- 2Critique of silent schadenfreude and debunking attack strategies
- 3Presentation of robust advantage as a superior strategy
- 4Discussion of consequentialist trolley calculations and the importance of practical details
- 5Analysis of the Footbridge case and the complexities of consequentialist decision-making
Key Distinctions
Consequentialism vs. deontology
Silent schadenfreude vs. debunking attack vs. robust advantage strategies
Act-consequentialism vs. rule-consequentialism
Key Terms
Consequentialism
Deontology
Trolley problem
Flashcards
30 cardsRelated Questions
In Woodcock's "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley", Thomson, Judith defines which of the following?
In Woodcock's "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley", Joshua D. Greene responds to which of the following?
In Woodcock's "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley", Brad Hooker supports which of the following?
Which of the following does Woodcock responds to in "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley"?
In Woodcock's "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley", Judith Thomson defines which of the following?
In Woodcock's "When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley", Joshua D. Greene criticizes which of the following?